The author says:
YA fantasy (sequel, so I have to have the same models on this cover as on the first book, which you can see here: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/62990067-dreamwalker )
Nathan says:
For everyone’s reference, here’s that first book’s cover:
Well, you’ve definitely got branding down…
I think the biggest problem with both covers is that the photo you have on top is just not impressive — between the lack of expression and either the poor original photography or the processing which washes out a lot of the contrast, it’s a lot less worthy of focus than the lower photograph. However, if you flipped it, the currently-on-top photo would be even less worthy of attention, and the readers who focused on it (secondarily, after the top image) would subconsciously feel that they had expended the brainpower to interpret an upside-down image with no real payoff.
My advice is to revise both covers, using the bottom image as your main image, and ditch the whole concept of the flipped upside-down images. I see from your book’s description on Goodreads that parallel/linked identities is a big part of the novel, but I think you can find a different way to indicate that visually.
Other comments?









