Category: Covers

Immaculate Days

The author says:

Immaculate Days is my debut poetry collection

Nathan says:

“Poetry” doesn’t give us much to go off — that’s a form, but it doesn’t really tell us much about the content. That said, I’ve noticed that most poetry collections published today share a lot of sensibilities with lit fic collections, in that the covers don’t want to be too attractive or enticing, lest they be seen as “pandering.”

But still, it wouldn’t hurt to put the word “poetry” on the cover, right?

Simply in terms of visual aesthetics, the biggest problem — and if you can’t see it in the larger image, you can definitely see it in the thumbnail — is that there’s not enough tonal contrast (dark vs. light) between your title text and your image.  Even though it’s red letters against a green background, the text still doesn’t stand out.  You can really see it if you desaturate the colors:

Other comments?

Terraforming Teardrop

The author says:

Safety and Liability Analyst Craig Shannon finds himself investigating the deaths of two people on the water-filled world called Teardrop. But the deaths were no accident, and all evidence points to a conspiracy against the peaceful alien natives known as the kell. Craig must search for the truth behind the plan to terraform Teardrop to not only save his own life, but the life of an entire planet.

This is a replacement cover to my existing novel. It is science fiction with elements of mystery and adventure. This is the finished cover. Because of the mixture of genres, I’m not sure which author’s readers it would appeal to.

Nathan says:

Because it’s a replacement, I decided that looking at the current cover would be instructive:

You’ve made changes, but I don’t think you’ve made improvements.

What you describe above is “SF” and “suspense.”  So what are the elements common to each? What are the visual cues that let readers of suspense and science fiction (and especially suspenseful SF) know at a glance that this is a book for them?

Suspense: Dark, shadowy settings with high contrast. People in shadow, or similarly lit in high contrast. The subtext of danger and flight.

Science fiction: Technology, space, alien fauna, SOMETHING that tells us we’re not in Kansas.

Both: Strong type.

So here’s the problem with your revised cover: You have none of that, except the “space” part — and even that isn’t easily discernible; in thumbnail, the planet could as easily be a rubber ball.

So: Pick a strong, clean font (probably sans serif). Let it dominate the cover, as opposed to sliding into the layout innocuously where it won’t intrude.  Use an image with stark contrast.  If you want to play up the novelty of the water-planet setting, make it a “wet” image.  (Drowning imagery works well for “being in over your head.”)

Other comments?

Robt House Burl. Co. Educ. Assoc

The author says:

1 Common Thread is the history of a African American family struggle for freedom. Still, others will uncover that they’re able to connect to their ancestors with this text.

Nathan says:

I honestly don’t know if this is really a cover that’s being sent for critique, or a mail accidentally sent to the wrong address.

Treating it in good faith as a cover seeking critique: It tells me NOTHING about the book.  It doesn’t even tell me that it IS a book — it looks like a photo accompanying an article in the newspaper. As a book cover, I’d assume it’s either by or possibly about the man on the cover, and maybe a municipal angle; there’s nothing to tell me that it’s about family or ancestors.  Heck, I don’t even know the TITLE of the book — I pulled the title of this post from the file name, assuming it was something close.

Seriously. You must have friends; explain the book to them and ask them for ideas for the cover. Whatever they come up with has got to be better than this.

The Green Book

The author says:

This work book accompanies our Can Cubs sessions and is a great way to review some of the content from class. Alternatively, it can aid kindergartens and home learning too! This workbook covers 10 different topics/themes, they include:
On the farm
Autumn I’m a little teapot
Old King Cole
Pirates
Circus
Jungle
Manners
Five senses
Shapes
Read | Talk | Solve | Write | Colour Together!

Nathan says:

I know that Comic Sans is a very readable font for young readers, and teachers have an inordinate fondness of it. But isn’t there some other handdrawn font you can use that doesn’t give adults hives?  Especially when you use it for everything…  (Maybe using a handdrawn font for the words that you’d expect preschoolers to read, and a different for for other text, such as “Preshoolers workbook.”) (By the way, is there a reason that “workbook” isn’t capitalized?)

The placement of the type doesn’t seem to have any awareness of the picture it covers. I didn’t realize that there was a person in the foreground holding the map until waaay too long.  If you’re not going to make the person visible, just excise the person and map, and move the pirate ship up so the grays bands behind the text don’t do it violence.

Speaking of those gray bars: I understand they can make the text more readable for young readers by isolating the letters from the cover image. Hover, there’s not enough difference in luminosity between the gray and the green of the word “Green” — the word becomes unreadable.

Other comments?

 

Legend of the Dark Star: Year One

The author says:

Lord of the Rootshire Province comes into the possession of a powerful relic: A masterpiece runeblade, capable of taking down armies with ease. He embarks on a mission with an Archmage and a Royal Protector on his side, to disenchant the runeblade little by little until it is weakened enough to be destroyed. Along the way, he obtains the only thing capable of countering the weapon’s powers: an Armor specifically created to battle against the weapon. With both the target and the contingency in his possession, the Lord continues his journey, gathering a group of misfits who fit in quite well.

Nathan says:

Nice art. But every decision you made after that diminishes its impact.

  1. There’s no point to having the dark bar across the top — it just takes up space and gives nothing back.  You should use the space the artist left up there to present the title at a size that it’s readable. (Honestly, I saw the text at the top, thought it was just a series title, and searched the rest of the cover for the actual book title before realizing that that was it.) Emphasize it.
  2. Too many fonts, and of the three you have, only the one used for the byline is even close to right for the genre. The italic font especially is both too gentle and too unreadable for the use you put it to.
  3. The random distribution of unneeded text is a bad decision, too.
  4. And none of those chunks of text is needed, anyway.  The top two don’t do anything to entice the reader, and the pullquote is both counterproductive (“starts slow” is NEVER a good thing to put on the cover) and unimpressive, since even a Google search didn’t tell me immediately who Dr. M.Z. Miah is and why his/her opinion should be persuasive.

The point of a book cover is to catch the attention of the target audience and get them to read the description, either on the back cover or on the sales page. That’s all. As a frequent contributor summarizes it, your cover is clickbait. Ditch the extra text and let your cover be the artwork, the title, and the byline. Put the title in a large, bold, readable typeface appropriate to the genre and let the cover do its work.

Other comments?